SOC 2001 WU Global Context of Prejudice Assimilation & Discrimination DiscussionCourse


SOC 2001 WU Global Context of Prejudice Assimilation & Discrimination DiscussionCourse

soc 2001School

Walden UniversityDepartment


Question Description

Learning Resources


Marger, M. N. (2015). Race and ethnic relations: American and global perspectives (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

  • Chapter 14, “South Africa: Society in Transition” (pp. 393–419)
  • Chapter 15, “Brazil: Racial and Ethnic Democracy” (pp. 421–448)

Shah, A. (2010). Racism. Global Issues: Social, Political, Economic and Environmental Issues That Affect Us All. Retrieved from…
Search through the website for examples of racism throughout the world.

Pew Research Center. (2016a). Global attitudes and trends. Retrieved from
Search the various resources and articles to learn about trends related to immigration, race, and ethnicity.
Use scholarly resources from the Walden Library when researching racial and ethnic experiences in various countries.


Ted Conferences (Producer). (2011). Maajid Nawaz: A global culture to fight extremism [Video file]. Retrieved from…
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 22 minutes.
“Why do transnational extremist organizations succeed where democratic movements have a harder time taking hold? Maajid Nawaz, a former Islamist extremist, asks for new grassroots stories and global social activism to spread democracy in the face of nationalism and xenophobia.”

Discussion: Prejudice, Assimilation, and Discrimination in a Global Context

The interaction of diverse racial and ethnic groups throughout the world is often associated with a history of prejudice and conflict. Many factors have contributed to the nature of this interaction such as colonialism, modernization, economic competition, labor demands, language, religion, ideology, and national policies. South Africa and Brazil provide contrasting cases studies. Understanding their recent history can be instructive in informing how race and ethnic challenges are addressed in other parts of the world.

In this week’s Discussion, you will analyze the historical background and treatment of racial and ethnic groups within South Africa, Brazil, or a country of your choosing, other than the country where you currently reside.

Note: In Week 3 and Week 4 Discussions, you are required to choose different racial or ethnic groups to analyze (a United States group in Week 3 and a Non-United States group in Week 4). For your Course Project you must use one of the groups you chose in either Week 3 or 4 to be the focus of your analysis.

To prepare:

  • Choose South Africa, Brazil, or an alternative choice (excluding Canada).
  • Review this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Consider the issues related to the group you chose with regard to their experience of prejudice, discrimination, and assimilation.


Post an analysis of the country you chose by addressing the following:

  • Identify the country’s major racial or ethnic groups.
  • Analyze the historical background and treatment of that country’s racial or ethnic groups, highlighting 2–3 important economic, social, and political forces that have shaped their experiences and/or pivotal events that were key turning points.
  • Provide 2–3 examples of discrimination or other social challenges that help shed light on the historical realities of race and ethnic interactions.
  • Compare the participation rates, employment levels, and income levels of the major racial or ethnic groups in that country.
  • Analyze 1–2 key policies that seek to address racial and ethnic issues.
  • Analyze foreseeable challenges this country might face as a result of emerging trends in racial and ethnic interactions.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial post.


Respond to two of your colleagues’ posts in one or more of the following ways:

  • Share an insight you gained from having read a colleague’s post about a group other than the one that you chose.
  • Share a different perspective and ask a probing or clarifying question.
  • Challenge responses: Explain why and how you see things differently.
  • Build on insights from your colleagues and offer data/evidence that further clarify an issue.