NR447 Week 6 Assignment: Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project. The purpose of this direct care project is for learners to apply the nursing process to assess if the nursing care provided by professionally certified nurses will result in improved patient outcomes. This is Part 4 of 4 in the Direct Care Project.Direct Care Project Overview
Overview | Points | Due Date | Project |
---|---|---|---|
Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis completed in Week 2 | |||
Part 2: Planning the Presentation completed in Week 4 | |||
Part 3: Implementing the Presentation Completed in Weeks 5 or 6 | |||
Part 4: Evaluation: Check-In | 10 | Wednesday of Week 6 | Required, graded check-in on progress of evaluation of your presentation and project. |
Part 4: Evaluating the Project | 200 | Sunday end of Week 6 | Evaluate learning and reflect on project. |
This direct care project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Part 4 enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6
200 Points
If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
Please note, your assignment will not be graded until the attendance form is submitted.
Click on the link below to download your template.
Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project Template (Download Here) (Links to an external site.)
**Academic Integrity**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
NR447 – Direct Care Project Part 4 Evaluating the Project
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle and Tables of results1. Title of presentation is present 2. PRE-Survey data is present in numerical form 3. POST-Survey data is present in numerical form 4. All survey questions addressed in data | 45 ptsExceptionalAll criteria are met 1. Title of presentation is present 2. PRE-Survey data is present in numerical form 3. POST-Survey data is present in numerical form 4. Each question addressed in data40 ptsExceedsProvides three of four criteria.36 ptsMeetsProvides two of four criteria.18 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides one of four criteria.0 ptsDevelopingProvides no criteria. | 45 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation of resultsIn comprehensive details, student 1. Summarized results of data 2. Identified positive or negative changes | 50 ptsExceptionalSummarizes in excellent detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.44 ptsExceedsSummarizes in good detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.40 ptsMeetsSummarizes in fair detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.18 ptsNeeds ImprovementSummarizes in minimal detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes0 ptsDevelopingProvides no criteria. | 50 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Part 1Reflection includes detailed description of: 1. Overall experience 2. Summary of outcome results | 40 ptsExceptionalReflection includes detailed description of overall experience and summary of outcome results.35 ptsExceedsReflection includes description of overall experience and summary of outcome results but lacks details in one criterion.32 ptsMeetsReflection includes description of overall experience and summary of outcome results but lacks details in both criteria15 ptsNeeds ImprovementMissing one criterion.0 ptsDevelopingProvides no experience or summary. | 40 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Part 2Reflection includes detailed description of: 1. Barriers to project 2. Gaps in the project 3. Implications for future practice | 40 ptsExceptionalReflection includes detailed description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice.35 ptsExceedsReflection includes description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice, but lacks details in one criterion.32 ptsMeetsReflection includes description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice, but lacks details in 2-3 criteria.15 ptsNeeds ImprovementMissing 1-2 criteria.0 ptsDevelopingProvides no barriers, gaps or implications. | 40 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalismProfessionalism includes:1. Correct spelling 2. Readable 3. Uses complete sentences 4. Proper grammar | 25 ptsExceptionalMeets all four criteria: 1. Correct spelling 2. Readable 3. Uses complete sentences 4. Proper grammar22 ptsExceedsDoes not meet one criterion.20 ptsMeetsDoes not meet 2 criteria.8 ptsNeeds ImprovementDoes not meet 3 criteria.0 ptsDevelopingDoes not meet all criteria. | 25 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Used | 0 ptsNo points deductedCorrect Template Used0 ptsPoints deducted – 20 Points Deducted (10% deduction)20 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used. | 0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction | 0 ptsNo points deductedSubmitted on time0 ptsNot Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day)1 day late = 10 Deduction; 2 day late = 20 Deduction; 3 day late = 30 Deduction; 4 day late = 40 Deduction; 5 day late = 50 Deduction; 6 day late = 60 Deduction; 7 day late = 70 Deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late |
Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?